Aternex

Cut loading an outbound call list from seven days of hand-keying to under five minutes, and completed calls rose from about 300 to nearly 3,500.

A healthcare services company made outbound customer-satisfaction calls for its clients. Each client sent a list of about 5,000 calls, and six people keyed every record into the triage information system by hand before the calling could start.

Switch between keying and importing

A week of hours against five minutes

Before: keying the list took 7 days, shown as all 168 squares of a week, one square per hour.

Six people moved from keying to calling

Drawn to scale: each square is 1 hour, 24 to a row, so the seven days are 168 squares. Under 5 minutes is drawn at its upper bound, 5 of the hour's 60 minutes.

How each figure was measured
ValueMethodRecordedScope
7 days to under 5 minutesRecalled from the work in 2007 to 2010 and written down on the date shown: six people keying one list by hand, against an import loading the file the client sent2026-10-01One outbound customer-satisfaction list of about 5,000 calls
about 300 to nearly 3,500 calls completedRecalled, as above: completed calls out of the roughly 5,000 listed, before and after the six people who had keyed the list moved to calling full time; one of them became the outbound manager2026-10-01The same list size, with the same six people

Dates are when each figure was recorded for this site; the work itself is dated in the setting above.

What this does not prove

The seven days was six people keying by hand, not a technical limit. The call counts are approximate: recalled, not taken from an exported report. The import freed the time; the same six people made the extra calls. Records matched what the client sent because nobody retyped them.

All proof

Want figures like these for your system?

Aternex measures the work before and after, then writes down what the numbers do not show. I reply within two business days.